🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and undue restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you likely can't establish limits at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding signs against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.